Is tech addictive? It won't be for long. | Joscha Bach

Share it with your friends Like

Thanks! Share it with your friends!


If you're interested in licensing this or any other Big Think clip for commercial or private use, contact our licensing partner Executive Interviews:

Do we want to be at the mercy of our devices, or do we want to be fulfilled? Cognitive scientist Joscha Bach explains how the big decision we're coming to in tech ethics will mimic another moment in tech history: the battle of the search engines. In the late 1990s, AltaVista was one of the world's most used search engines—at least until a "small and inconsequential" startup called Google came along. AltaVista served ads, and Google didn't (not back then). For the public, the choice was easy; there's a reason you "Google" the weather rather than "AltaVista" it. We face the same decision now: will we choose tech that harvests our attention and sells it, like highly addictive social media apps; or will we choose tech that is useful to us—products that help us achieve our own goals? "Right now we mostly build applications that utilize the cravings of people, that make them addicted. People start checking their smartphones every few seconds to see if a new email arrived. But this new email is not going to make them more happy and fulfilled." In the long run, says Bach, technology that aligns with what people want wins. As long as we want the right things, the days of addictive tech are numbered. Joscha Bach's latest book is Principles of Synthetic Intelligence PSI: An Architecture of Motivated Cognition (Oxford Series on Cognitive Models and Architectures)


Follow Big Think here:

Joscha Bach: I remember when the first search engines came around, and back then AltaVista was a very big thing. AltaVista tried to strike a balance between the inconveniences—in terms of advertising and so on that could put off the user—and the utility had for the user. So it would, for instance, mix search results with advertising.

And at this point Google came along. Google was very small and inconsequential, and nobody really took it seriously. But it did an amazing thing: it did give people exactly what they wanted. It gave them a pretty much ad-free experience. It gave them exactly the search results that they wanted, the best ones, the closest ones to what people wanted to have. And Google dramatically outperformed AltaVista. AltaVista disappeared.

That was an amazing insight, to see that if you are in the dramatically scalable economy, like the Internet, where you have the biggest amount of competition that you can possibly have, you need to build a product that is optimally aligned with the interest of the users—unless you manage to get some kind of monopoly and can drive out other competition.

And so when we build new products in that space we have to think about how to build the most useful product. Not necessarily just the product that is going to make the biggest amount of money, that is going to have the most efficient business model in some sense or the best business case. Eventually, it’s going to be the product that is getting the most use by people. And people will find out that they will use what is most useful to them. In the long run, that’s going to be the stuff that is not addictive, that is hygienic, that serves the actual needs, that makes them more happy and fulfilled. And right now we mostly build applications that utilize the cravings of people, that make them addicted. People start checking their smartphones every few seconds to see if a new email arrived. But this new email is not going to make them more happy and fulfilled. Instead, it takes away their attention.

So I believe the next big movement in how we build technical systems will be hygienic technology. It will be how to build systems that are careful with our attention and how we use it, and that is careful with our way of living and what we want to achieve with the tools that we are building.


Michael Davidson says:

The most competitive technologies in the marketplace will be the most addictive ones, unfortunately, because they will have the highest demand.

LouisBagHitSquad says:

Tech is not addictive if you don't want it to be. You choose what apps you install and use, and more importantly what notifications you see.

Kyle Clements says:

This is the direction forward!

Gameplay and Talk says:

I sure hope he is right.

4 & 20 Black Birds says:

the roman gave people what they wanted. the roman colosseum. has the Colosseum gone away? ever been to a football game?

Lennart Witstock says:

I Hope that you are right

Zaigham Janjua says:

Is tech nauseating? Don't worry you won't be for long!,

charles williams says:

Lots of comments in the comments section.

Bitsof Bytes says:

Commodore shirt logo haaaa

Bitsof Bytes says:

Cash and adrenaline .. U know bikes skatbrdz etc are king… But some suckers like to mess w peoples lives n screw up their kids' future parks systems w capitalist consumer bs..nah mean?!

Jesse Mann says:

This is like saying heroin addicts will just stop using because they just wake up one day and realize it is self destructive. That is just not how addiction works. It takes support groups. It takes community. It takes a lifelong struggle to break the chains of addiction – and with Facebook and Google making a heroin in a digital form – I suspect it will take the same determination to get free of their products for many people

Valerie Angell says:

I LOVE dopamine!Give me more!

Westwood says:

Let's de-sensationalize the word "addiction". It's just a method for coping with the depression caused by some bigger socio-cultural issue.

telman222 says:

I just started using Google pay. That is actually useful.

Write a comment