Dr. Andrew Ng, Founder + CEO, deeplearning.ai;
Co-founder, Coursera; Adjunct Professor, Stanford
R.G. Lewis with the Comment of the year on this video...
On Oct. 9, 2018, John Lennox addressed the critical questions surrounding artificial intelligence and how the future of artificial intelligence bears on a Christian vision of reality. This event was hosted at the Zacharias Institute in Alpharetta, GA, and is part of a new series called #TrendingQuestions. For more information about upcoming installments in this series visit: https://rzim.org/trending-questions/
Check out the Most AMAZING Examples Of Artificial Intelligence (AI)! From deep learning sophisticated robots to machine learning computers, this top 10 list of incredible technology will amaze you!
A robotics researcher afraid of robots, Peter Haas, invites us into his world of understand where the threats of robots and artificial intelligence lie. Before we get to Sci-Fi robot death machines, there's something right in front of us we need to confront - ourselves. Peter is the Associate Director of the Brown University Humanity Centered Robotics Initiative. He was the Co-Founder and COO of XactSense, a UAV manufacturer working on LIDAR mapping and autonomous navigation. Prior to XactSense, Peter founded AIDG – a small hardware enterprise accelerator in emerging markets. Peter received both TED and Echoing Green fellowships. He has been a speaker at TED Global, The World Bank, Harvard University and other venues. He holds a Philosophy B.A. from Yale. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx
A independent report commissioned by the UK government to examine how competition policy needs to adapt itself for the digital age has concluded that tech giants don’t face adequate competition and the law needs updating to address what it dubs the “novel” challenges of ‘winner takes all’ platforms.
The panel also recommends more policy interventions to actively support startups, including a code of conduct for “the most significant digital platforms”; and measures to foster data portability, open standards and interoperability to help generate competitive momentum for rival innovations.
UK chancellor Philip Hammond announced the competition market review last summer, saying the government was committed to asking “the big questions about how we ensure these new digital markets work for everyone”.
The culmination of the review — a 150-page report, published today, entitled Unlocking digital competition — is the work of the government’s digital competition expert panel which is chaired by former U.S. president Barack Obama’s chief economic advisor, professor Jason Furman.
“The digital sector has created substantial benefits but these have come at the cost of increasing dominance of a few companies which is limiting competition and consumer choice and innovation. Some say this is inevitable or even desirable. I think the UK can do better,” Furman said today in a statement.
In the report the panel writes that it believes competition policy should be “given the tools to tackle new challenges, not radically shifted away from its established basis”.
“In particular, policy should remain based on careful weighing of economic evidence and models,” they suggest, arguing also that “consumer welfare” remains the “appropriate perspective to motivate competition policy” — and rejecting the idea that a completely new approach is needed.
But, crucially, their view of consumer welfare is a broad church, not a narrow price trench — with the report asserting that a consumer welfare basis to competition law is able to also take account of other things, including (but also not limited to) “choice, quality and innovation”.
Furman said the panel, which was established in September 2018, has outlined “a balanced proposal to give people more control over their data, give small businesses more of a chance to enter and thrive, and create more predictability for the large digital companies”.
“These recommendations will deliver an economic boost driven by UK tech start-ups and innovation that will give consumers greater choice and protection,” he argues.
Commenting on the report’s publication, Hammond said: “Competition is fundamental to ensuring the market works in the interest of consumers, but we know some tech giants are still accumulating too much power, preventing smaller businesses from entering the market,” adding that: “The work of Jason Furman and the expert panel is invaluable in ensuring we’re at the forefront of delivering a competitive digital marketplace.”
The chancellor said that the government will “carefully examine” the proposals and respond later this year — with a plan for implementing changes he said are necessary “to ensure our digital markets are competitive and consumers get the level of choice they deserve”.
The panel rejects the view — mostly loudly propounded by tech giants and their lobbying vehicles — that competition is thriving online, ergo no competition policy changes are needed.
It also rejects the argument that digital platforms are “natural monopolies” and competition is impossible — dismissing the idea of imposing utility-like regulation, such as in the energy sector.
Instead, the panel writes that it sees “greater competition among digital platforms as not only necessary but also possible — provided the right policies are in place”. The biggest “missing set of policies” are ones that would “actively help foster competition”, it argues in the report’s introduction.
“Instead of just relying on traditional competition tools, the UK should take a forward-looking approach that creates and enforces a clear set of rules to limit anti-competitive actions by the most significant digital platforms while also reducing structural barriers that currently hinder effective competition,” the panel goes on to say, calling for new rules to tackle ‘winner take all’ tech platforms that are based on “generally agreed principles and developed into more specific codes of conduct with the participation of a wide range of stakeholders”.
Coupled with active policy efforts to support startups and scale-ups — by making it easier for consumers to move their data across digital services; pushing for systems to be built around open standards; and for data held by tech giants to be made available for competitors — the suggested reforms would support a system that’s “more flexible, predictable and timely” than the current regime, they assert.
Among the panel’s specific recommendations are a call to set up a new competition unit with expertise in technology, economics and behavioural science, plus the legal powers to back it up.
The panel envisages this unit focusing on giving users more control over their data — to foster platform switching — as well as developing a code of competitive conduct that would apply to the largest platforms. “This would be applied only to particularly powerful companies, those deemed to have ‘strategic market status’, in order to avoid creating new burdens or barriers for smaller firms,” they write.
Another recommendation is to beef up regulators’ existing powers for tackling illegal anti-competitive practices — to make it quicker and simpler to prosecute breaches, with the report highlighting bullying tactics by market leaders as a current problem.
“There is nothing inherently wrong about being a large company or a monopoly and, in fact, in many cases this may reflect efficiencies and benefits for consumers or businesses. But dominant companies have a particular responsibility not to abuse their position by unfairly protecting, extending or exploiting it,” they write. “Existing antitrust enforcement, however, can often be slow, cumbersome, and unpredictable. This can be especially problematic in the fast-moving digital sector.
“That is why we are recommending changes that would enable more use of interim measures to prevent damage to competition while a case is ongoing, and adjusting appeal standards to balance protecting parties’ interests with the need for the competition authority to have usable tools and an appropriate margin of judgement. The goal is to place less reliance on large fines and drawn-out procedures, instead enabling faster action that more directly targets and remedies the problematic behavior.”
The expert panel also says changes to merger rules are required to enable the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to intervene to stop digital mergers that are likely to damage future competition, innovation and consumer choice — saying current decisions are too focused on short-term impacts.
“Over the last 10 years the 5 largest firms have made over 400 acquisitions globally. None has been blocked and very few have had conditions attached to approval, in the UK or elsewhere, or even been scrutinised by competition authorities,” they note.
More priority should be given to reviewing the potential implications of digital mergers, in their view.
Decisions on whether to approve mergers, by the CMA and other authorities, have often focused on short-term impacts. In dynamic digital markets, long-run effects are key to whether a merger will harm competition and consumers. Could the company that is being bought grow into a competitor to the platform? Is the source of its value an innovation that, under alternative ownership, could make the market less concentrated? Is it being bought for access to consumer data that will make the platform harder to challenge? In principle, all of these questions can inform merger decisions within the current, mainstream framework for competition, centred on consumer welfare. There is no need to shift away from this, or implement a blanket presumption against digital mergers, many of which may benefit consumers. Instead, these issues need to be considered more consistently and effectively in practice.
In part the CMA can achieve this through giving a higher priority to merger decisions in digital markets. These cases can be complex, but they affect markets that are critically important to consumers, providing services that shape the digital economy.
In another recommendation which targets the Google -Facebook adtech duopoly, the report also calls for the CMA to launch a formal market study into the digital advertising market — which it notes suffers from a lack of transparency.
The panel also notes similar concerns raised by other recent reviews.
Digital advertising is increasingly driven by the use of consumers’ personal data for targeting. This in turn drives the competitive advantage for platforms able to learn more about more users’ identity, location and preferences. The market operates through a complex chain of advertising technology layers, where subsidiaries of the major platforms compete on opaque terms with third party businesses. This report joins the Cairncross Review and Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee in calling for the CMA to use its investigatory capabilities and powers to examine whether actors in these markets are operating appropriately to deliver effective competition and consumer benefit.
The report also calls for new powers to force the largest tech companies to open up to smaller firms by providing access to key data sets, albeit without infringing on individual privacy — citing Open Banking as a “notable” data mobility model that’s up and running.
“Open Banking provides an instructive example of how policy intervention can overcome technical and co-ordination challenges and misaligned incentives by creating an adequately funded body with the teeth to drive development and implementation by the nine largest financial institutions,” it suggests.
The panel urges the UK to engage internationally on the issue of digital regulation, writing that: “Many countries are considering policy changes in this area. The United Kingdom has the opportunity to lead by example, by helping to stimulate a global discussion that is based on the shared premise that competition is beneficial, competition is possible, but that we need to update our policies to protect and expand this competition for the sake of consumers and vibrant, dynamic economies.”
And in just one current example of the considerable chatter now going on around tech + competition, a House of Lords committee this week also recommended public interest tests for proposed tech mergers, and suggested an overarching digital regulator is needed to help plug legislative gaps and work through regulatory overlap.
Discussing the pros and cons of concentration in digital markets, the expert competition panel notes the efficiency and convenience that this dynamic can offer consumers and businesses, as well as potential gains via product innovation.
However the panel also points to what it says can be “substantial downsides” from digital market concentration, including erosion of consumer privacy; barriers to entry and scale for startups; and blocks to wider innovation, which it asserts can “outweigh any static benefits” — writing:
It can raise effective prices for consumers, reduce choice, or impact quality. Even when consumers do not have to pay anything for the service, it might have been that with more competition consumers would have given up less in terms of privacy or might even have been paid for their data. It can be harder for new companies to enter or scale up. Most concerning, it could impede innovation as larger companies have less to fear from new entrants and new entrants have a harder time bringing their products to market — creating a trade-off where the potential dynamic costs of concentration outweigh any static benefits.
The panel takes a clear view that “competition for the market cannot be counted on, by itself, to solve the problems associated with market tipping and ‘winner-takes-most’” — arguing that past regulatory interventions have helped shift market conditions, i.e. by facilitating the technology changes that created new markets and companies which led to dominant tech giants of old being unseated.
So, in other words, the panel believes government action can unlock market disruption — hence the report’s title — and that it’s too simplistic a narrative to claim technological change alone will reset markets.
For example, IBM’s dominance of hardware in the 1960s and early 1970s was rendered less important by the emergence of the PC and software. Microsoft’s dominance of operating systems and browsers gave way to a shift to the internet and an expansion of choice. But these changes were facilitated, in part, by government policy — in particular antitrust cases against these companies, without which the changes may never have happened.
The panel also argues there’s an acceleration of market dominance in the modern digital economy that makes it even more necessary for governments to respond, writing that “network effects and returns to scale of data appear to be even more entrenched and the market seems to have stabilised quickly compared to the much larger degree of churn in the early days of the World Wide Web”.
They also point to the risk of AI and machine learning technology leading to further market concentration, warning that “the companies most able to take advantage of [the next technological revolution] may well be the existing large companies because of the importance of data for the successful use of these tools”.
And while they suggest AI startups might offer a route to a competitive reset, via a substantial technology shift, there’s still currently no relief to be had from entrepreneurial efforts because of “the degree that entrants are acquired by the largest companies – with little or no scrutiny”.
Discussing other difficulties related to regulating big tech, the panel warns of the risk of regulators being “captured by the companies they are regulating”; as well as point out they are generally at a disadvantage vs the high tech innovators they are seeking to rule.
In a concluding chapter considering the possible impacts of their policy recommendations, the panel argues that successful execution of their approach could help foster startup innovation across a range of sectors and services.
“Across digital markets, implementing the recommendations will enable more new companies to turn innovative ideas into great new services and profitable businesses,” they suggest. “Some will continue to be acquired by large platforms, where that is the best route to bring new technology to a large group of users. Others will grow and operate alongside the large platforms. Digital services will be more diverse, more dynamic, with more specialisation and choice available for consumers wanting it. This could drive a flourishing of investment in these UK businesses.”
Citing some “potential examples” of services that could evolve in this more supportively competitive environment they suggest social content aggregators might arise that “bring together the best material from people’s friends across different platforms and sites”; “privacy services could give consumers a single simple place to manage the information they share across different platforms”; and also envisage independent ad tech businesses and changed market dynamics that can “rebalance the share of advertising revenue back towards publishers”.
The main envisaged benefits for consumers boil down to greater service and feature choice; enhanced privacy and transparency; and genuine control over the services they use and how they want to use them.
While for startups and scale-ups the panel sees open standards and access to data — and indeed effective enforcement, by the new digital markets unit — creating “a wide range of opportunities to develop and serve new markets adjacent to or interconnected with existing digital platforms”.
The combined impact should be to strengthen and deepen the competitive digital ecosystem, they believe.
Another envisaged benefit for startups is “trust in the framework and recognition that promising, innovative digital businesses will be protected from foreclosure or exclusion” — which they argue “should catalyse investment in UK digital businesses, driving the sector’s growth”.
“The changes to competition law… mean that where a business can grow into a successful competitor, that route to further growth is protected and companies will not in the future see being subsumed into a dominant platform as the only realistic business model,” they add.
In the coming weeks, AWS is launching new G4 instances with support for Nvidia’s T4 Tensor Core GPUs, the company today announced at Nvidia’s GTC conference. The T4, which is based on Nvidia’s Turing architecture, was specifically optimized for running AI models. The T4 will be supported by the EC2 compute service and the Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes.
“NVIDIA and AWS have worked together for a long time to help customers run compute-intensive AI workloads in the cloud and create incredible new AI solutions,” said Matt Garman, vice president of Compute Services at AWS, in today’s announcement. “With our new T4-based G4 instances, we’re making it even easier and more cost-effective for customers to accelerate their machine learning inference and graphics-intensive applications.”
The T4 is also the first GPU on AWS that supports Nvidia’s raytracing technology. That’s not what Nvidia is focusing on with this announcement, but creative pros can use these GPUs to take the company’s real-time raytracing technology for a spin.
For the most part, though, it seems like Nvidia and AWS expect that developers will use the T4 to put AI models into production. It’s worth noting that the T4 hasn’t been optimized for training these models, but they can obviously be used for that as well. Indeed, with the new Cuda-X AI libraries (also announced today), Nvidia now offers an end-to-end platform for developers who want to use its GPUs fr deep learning, machine learning and data analytics.
In this episode Sam Harris speaks with computer scientist Stuart Russell about the challenge of building artificial intelligence that is compatible with human well-being.
In this episode Sam Harris speaks with Eliezer Yudkowsky about the nature of intelligence, different types of AI, the “alignment problem,” IS vs OUGHT, the possibility that future AI might deceive us, the AI arms race, conscious AI, coordination problems, and other topics.
Use my Tile referral link & check out this app that helps you find your keys! http://ssqt.co/meeAf5P
This clip is taken from the Joe Rogan Experience podcast #804 with Sam Harris (https://youtu.be/RJ5_hAEsLkU), also available for download via iTunes & Stitcher (http://bit.ly/1XvSzR3).
Were the Eagles the George Orwell of music? Did they somehow ‘take a trip’ into our present age where we are (virtual) ‘prisoners of our own device’, courtesy tech giants at Silicon Valley, California?
Yes, there are multiple interpretations of the legendary song ‘Hotel California’ and the Silicon Valley angle may not have been on the mind of the artists. But, the nature of art is such that no artist can ever fully comprehend all aspects of his own creation. It is observers who interpret art from diverse perspectives, making the act of observation itself an art in its own right.
The following perspective gently crept up to me while I was doing some thinking on our age of digital dystopia, while in the background the Eagles sang about their strange experiences at Hotel California. Somewhere, from the deep depths of my mind, an unexpected question gently surfaced seeking light in the digital age. Why was the title of the song ‘Hotel California’ and not ‘Hotel Chicago’ or ‘Hotel Florida’?
Another thought followed suit. How come the lyrics like ‘you can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave’ and ‘we are programmed to receive’ take on a whole new meaning when examined in the context of present day California that is home to Silicon Valley?
One after another, like divers surfacing for air, random phrases from the song started surfacing with a whole new meaning.
The song starts with the words ‘On a dark desert highway.
Today we live in a Dark Age of Instagrammesque narcissism, a desert like digital wasteland of big and largely useless data on the high speed information superhighway.
Warm smell of colitas, rising up through the air
Up ahead in the distance, I saw a shimmering light
My head grew heavy and my sight grew dim
I had to stop for the night.
There she stood in the doorway;
I heard the mission bell
And I was thinking to myself
‘This could be heaven or this could be Hell’
Then she lit up a candle and she showed me the way
There were voices down the corridor,
I thought I heard them say
Welcome to the Hotel California
The warm smell of colitas (marijuana flower buds) transports them to the doorway of the digital age that ‘could be heaven or hell’. Led by a lady holding a candle, they moved down the broadband corridors, where invisible (possibly automated) voices welcomed them to Hotel (Silicon Valley) California, the nerve centre of the Age of Information Technology.
Such a lovely place (such a lovely place)
Such a lovely face.
This is disturbingly indicative of photo shopped face selfies taken in air brushed, picture perfect places where every frame is filtered to X-pro II, Lo-Fi and their cousins. The word ‘face’ inevitably brings up images of Facebook, the social media forum that has definitively changed the way the world works.
Plenty of room at the Hotel California
Any time of year (any time of year) you can find it here
There is always plenty of room or unlimited server space any time of the year to host your multiple digital avatars, courtesy tech giants at Hotel California.
Her mind is Tiffany-twisted
This imagery refers to a girl, who represents a superficial generation whose mind is warped to a point of perversion by everything glittery, just like the jewellery at the super expensive Tiffany’s jewellery store. It’s interesting that one of the main standouts of Tiffany are its blue boxes. Popular social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin etc are all headquartered in Silicon Valley and have blue as their primary colour.
She got the Mercedes bends
She has the Mercedes bends (not benz). “The bends,” is also known as decompression sickness. You get the bends, for example, if you ‘surface’ too fast while scuba diving. Mercedes bends is an interesting play of words meaning a flashy, superficial life only lived at the surface, just like our shallow digital personas.
She got a lot of pretty, pretty boys, that she calls friends
This again refers to an entire generation obsessed with looking good by hanging out with stylish people they barely know, whom they call friends. This also reminds us of all our hundreds of social media ‘friends’, whom we don’t know.
How they dance in the courtyard, sweet summer sweat
There is something borderline disturbing about this line, reminiscent of how we display our private lives, opinions and emotions in the open courtyard of social media, for good and for bad, while the world watches, comments and judges and how this has become our new normal.
Some dance to remember, some dance to forget
Some of our social media engagements are to reconnect with past friends we remember or to create memories that we can later remember digitally as our biological memory fades. At other times we just want to dissolve bad memories by living larger than life digital avatars that barely resemble our real lives.
So I called up the Captain,
‘Please bring me my wine’
From superficiality and narcissism, there is a sudden shift to a need for sophistication indicated by asking the captain for wine. Wine indicates finesse and captains at formal restaurants ensure quality control and finesse.
He said, ‘we haven’t had that spirit here since nineteen sixty-nine’
The words ‘spirit’ and ‘nineteen sixty nine’ bring validation to this digital age interpretation of Hotel California. Interestingly, 1969 was the year when the internet actually started in the ‘Spirit of Community’.
The Advanced Research Project, under the U.S. Department of Defense, hired Dr. J.C.R. Licklider in 1962 to respond back to the Soviet Union’s launch of a satellite manned by a dog. Dr. Licklider’s intentions were as follows:
His idea for the project was the “spirit of community” and he was interested in “having computers help people communicate with other people” (Licklider, Licklider, and Robert Taylor) as opposed to using the computer to communicate for us.
The first message was sent over the ARPANET in 1969 from computer science Professor Leonard Kleinrock’s laboratory at University of California to the second network node at Stanford Research Institute, thus kickstarting the internet era as we know it today.
The lyrics ‘we haven’t had that spirit here since nineteen sixty nine’ seem to suggest that the founding spirit of the internet i.e to help people connect with other people using computers has transformed into a narcissist and dystopian beast that is threatening the fabric of social interactions.
They livin’ it up at the Hotel California
What a nice surprise (what a nice surprise), bring your alibis
At Hotel California, everyone irrespective of their imperfect lives in the real world make sure their digital avatars are living it up in surprising style on the silicon playground.
Alibi refers to a situation when one is physically in one place, but is building up an illusion of being in another place. That’s what we do through our social media avatars. Irrespective of our physical locations, our online activities are basically happening on Silicon Valley controlled servers. This also draws our attention to the problem of cyber crime and the dark web that transcends geographical locations.
Mirrors on the ceiling,
There is something voyeuristic in this statement. It indicates the perverted pleasure of watching oneself (on selfie mode), surveillance and violation of privacy by tech giants; all ailments that plague residents of our digital age.
The pink champagne on ice
Pink Champagne is also called rose wine. This indicates the rose — tinted world that we live in digitally, that is such a contrast to our ice like colourless real lives of increasing isolation, loss of privacy etc and crumbling down of the world as we know it.
Interestingly, a description of Pink Champagne reveals very interesting parallels to modern day human behavior.
According to Sam Heitner, director of the Office of Champagne USA, ‘its fashion, its hip, its a way to make a big statement that you know what you are doing, to have a different look at a party because its about the color of what’s in the glass’.
Laura Maniec, director of wine & spirits for B.R.Guest Restaurant Group in New York, finds that the striking color has a contagious effect. If you are pouring it by the glass, she says, people see it, and all of a sudden everybody will start ordering it. (Source: Forbes)
Both quotes indicate how people on social media are drawn to the saturation of a substance rather than the substance itself.
And she said, ‘we are all just prisoners here, of our own device’
This conjures up images of a picture perfect generation who are mentally prisoners of their internet enabled devices that they simply can’t disconnect from. They have traded their privacy to tech overlords in Hotel California in exchange for living digitally augmented super — lives online.
And in the master’s chambers,
They gathered for the feast
Now that they had the whole world in their digital net, the tech overlords gathered at their headquarters in Silicon Valley to gather their billions of dollars.
They stab it with their steely knives,
But they just can’t kill the beast
But, they realize that their own creation has turned into a beast that refused to obey its master and cannot be ‘killed’ anymore by human means. This is indicative of the increasing powers of Artificial Intelligence and predictions of how it could become an existential threat for humans and would not respond to a kill switch.
Last thing I remember, I was
Running for the door
I had to find the passage back to the place I was before
Realising that Hotel California was not only sleazy and superficial, but that it’s real manager was a beast that controlled even its creators, they started running back to the gateway to their old and happier lives.
‘Relax’ said the night man,
‘We are programmed to receive.
You can check out any time you like,
But you can never leave!’
At the gateway, they meet the night man who cryptically says ‘we are programmed to receive’. This indicates information we receive through our devices from a tightly knit corporate matrix that hopes to control our thinking. He tells them that physically they can check out of Hotel California anytime they like. But, their digital avatars can never leave. They will always remain guests on the spacious servers of Hotel California.
Is Hotel California about Silicon Valley? was originally published in Becoming Human: Artificial Intelligence Magazine on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Earlier this year, Helen Greiner-founded drone startup CyPhy Works announced a major change. The company was rebooting and renaming itself Aria Insights, a move that arrived with a newfound AI/data-driven focus. Now, just over two months later, the company is no more.
Reports that Aria had shuttered began surfacing earlier this week. Moments ago, the company confirmed the move in a tersely worded statement offered to TechCrunch:
Aria Insights has ceased operations effective March 21, 2019.
That’s the sum total of the insight provided by Lance VandenBrook, the former CyPhy CEO who resumed that role as the company transitioned back in January. The move appears to be an abrupt one, with little to no information offered to external parties. It brings to mind last year’s sudden closure of Rethink Robotics, another company launched by a former iRobot co-founder.
Full disclosure: We announced last month that the company’s CTO would be appearing onstage at our Robotics event next month. That, like everything else apart from Aria’s drones, appears to be up in the air at the moment.
More information as we get it.
Dr Demis Hassabis, Co-founder and CEO of DeepMind speaking at CSAR – Apr 6, 2017
Google’s Doodles are often elaborate creations, but the upcoming Doodle to celebrate the birthday of composer Johann Sebastian Bach is positively baroque.
With the help of artificial intelligence, the interactive Doodle allows users to generate harmonies for any melody they input in the style of the famous 18th century composer. Google used machine learning to analyze the harmonies of more than 300 Bach compositions, replicating the patterns it found to fit the user’s suggested melody.
You can input short single-line melodies that are just two bars long and change the key of the music and its tempo. You can also download the resulting composition as a MIDI file or share it with friends. The Doodle also includes some hidden surprises. Click the mini amplifier to the right of the keyboard to upgrade the instruments to ‘80s synths.
The Doodle is a neat demonstration of both the possibilities and limitations of AI to generate music. As Anna Huang, a resident AI researcher with Google’s Magenta project who created the Doodle, explains to The Verge, the underlying AI model was trained on Bach’s chorale harmonizations, which are harmonizations of existing hymns.
This is particularly compliant data for AI to learn from, says Huang. “The Bach compositions in this dataset are highly structured, and the style is very concise, yet with rich harmonies, allowing machine learning models to learn more with less data.” It also helps that Bach is a composer of Baroque music: a highly formalized genre with consistent rules.
Huang, who studied music composition as an undergrad and grad, says she’s always looking for new ways to compose. AI gives her a tool that can fill in the missing parts of a piece, giving her new material to sculpt. “As a result, you can try out ideas more quickly, and see if you encounter something that sparks,” she says.
She also notes that as with other musical AI projects, this technology is far from a perfect composer. One thing machine learning generators struggle with, for example, is creating long-term structure and coherence. “What is harder to replicate is Bach’s balance in simplicity and expressiveness and the longer arcs in his music,” says Huang.
The Bach-inspired Google Doodle will go live 12AM ET on Thursday, March 21st, and it will be available for 48 hours across 77 markets. You can read more about the technology behind it here.
Update March 20th 3:00PM ET: Updated with additional comment from Magenta AI resident Anna Huang.
Join our secret society: http://bit.ly/lansana
Demis drew on his eclectic experiences as an AI researcher, neuroscientist and videogames designer to discuss what is happening at the cutting edge of AI research, including the recent historic AlphaGo match, and its future potential impact on fields such as science and healthcare, and how developing AI may help us better understand the human mind.
Garry Kasparov and DeepMind’s CEO Demis Hassabis discuss Garry’s new book “Deep Thinking”, his match with Deep Blue and his thoughts on the future of AI in the world of chess.
Demis Hassabis, world-renowned British neuroscientist, artificial intelligence (AI) researcher and the co-founder and CEO of DeepMind, explores the groundbreaking research driving the application of AI to scientific discovery.
"Quantum Computing as a Service" - Matt Johnson & Randall Correll of QCWare
Read "Quantum Engineering: A New Frontier" from "ENGenious" Issue No.14. http://eas.caltech.edu/engenious/14/quantum_engineering
(12 Sep 2017) LEADIN
Audi is showing its futuristic autonomous, electric concept car at the Frankfurt Motor Show.
The Audi Aicon - the name is a play on AI for artificial intelligence and Icon - does not have a steering wheel or pedals and has a range of 700 kilometres according to the company.
German car manufacturer Audi is showing off its latest concept of how a future autonomous, electric car will look like at the IAA motor show in Frankfurt.
The four-door Audi Aicon certainly looks like something from a science fiction movie.
The car has no steering wheel and no pedals. Instead, it has two chairs that can swivel around and a full entertainment system.
According to Audi, the Aicon can drive 700-800 kilometer per charge.
Rupert Stadler, Audi Chairman, says it shows what a car that has the highest level of autonomous driving capabilities, called level five, can look like.
Lou Ann Hammond, CEO of Driving the Nation automobile news website says Audi is at the very forefront of autonomous driving worldwide.
As the cars start driving themselves, the interior design will become more important, she says.
"Because what you are going to be doing is watching TV, doing video conferencing, listening to music," she says.
The IAA motor show in Frankfurt opens to the media today, Tuesday, and runs through September 24.
The Future of Audi Car | Human & Artificial Intelligence. Audi demonstrates Artificial intelligence with Automatic driving along with Audi AI Technology and NVIDIA. At CES 2017 they stated that Audi and Nvidia to Make AI-Powered Cars by 2020.
European governments have been bringing the hammer down on tech in recent months, slapping record fines and stiff regulations on the largest imports out of Silicon Valley. Despite pleas from the world’s leading companies and Europe’s eroding trust in government, European citizens’ staunch support for regulation of new technologies points to an operating environment that is only getting tougher.
According to a roughly 25-page report recently published by a research arm out of Spain’s IE University, European citizens remain skeptical of tech disruption and want to handle their operators with kid gloves, even at a cost to the economy.
The survey was led by the IE’s Center for the Governance of Change — an IE-hosted research institution focused on studying “the political, economic, and societal implications of the current technological revolution and advances solutions to overcome its unwanted effects.” The “European Tech Insights 2019” report surveyed roughly 2,600 adults from various demographics across seven countries (France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, The Netherlands, and the UK) to gauge ground-level opinions on ongoing tech disruption and how government should deal with it.
The report does its fair share of fear-mongering and some of its major conclusions come across as a bit more “clickbaity” than insightful. However, the survey’s more nuanced data and line of questioning around specific forms of regulation offer detailed insight into how the regulatory backdrop and operating environment for European tech may ultimately evolve.
An institute established by Stanford University to address concerns that AI may not represent the whole of humanity is lacking in diversity.
The goal of the Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence is admirable, but the fact it consists primarily of white males brings into doubt its ability to ensure adequate representation.
Cybersecurity expert Chad Loder noticed that not a single member of Stanford’s new AI faculty was black. Tech site Gizmodo reached out to Stanford and the university quickly added Juliana Bidadanure, an assistant professor of philosophy.
Part of the institute’s problem could be the very thing it’s attempting to address – that, while improving, there’s still a lack of diversity in STEM-based careers. With revolutionary technologies such as AI, parts of society are in danger of being left behind.
The institute has backing from some big-hitters. People like Bill Gates and Gavin Newsom have pledged their support that “creators and designers of AI must be broadly representative of humanity.”
Stanford isn’t the only institution fighting the good fight against bias in algorithms.
Earlier this week, AI News reported on the UK government’s launch of an investigation to determine the levels of bias in algorithms that could affect people’s lives.
Conducted by the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation (CDEI), the investigation will focus on areas where AI has tremendous potential – such as policing, recruitment, and financial services – but would have a serious negative impact on lives if not implemented correctly.
Meanwhile, activists like Joy Buolamwini from the Algorithmic Justice League are doing their part to raise awareness of the dangers which bias in AI poses.
In a speech earlier this year, Buolamwini analysed current popular facial recognition algorithms and found serious disparities in accuracy – particularly when recognising black females.
Just imagine surveillance being used with these algorithms. Lighter skinned males would be recognised in most cases, but darker skinned females would be mistakenly stopped more often. We’re in serious danger of automating profiling.
Some efforts are being made to create AIs which detect unintentional bias in other algorithms – but it’s early days for such developments, and they will also need diverse creators.
However it’s tackled, algorithmic bias needs to be eliminated before it’s adopted in areas of society where it will have a negative impact on individuals.
Interested in hearing industry leaders discuss subjects like this and their use cases? Attend the co-located AI & Big Data Expo events with upcoming shows in Silicon Valley, London, and Amsterdam to learn more. Co-located with the IoT Tech Expo, Blockchain Expo, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.
The post Stanford’s institute ensuring AI ‘represents humanity’ lacks diversity appeared first on AI News.
In this episode of the Making Sense podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Nick Bostrom about the problem of existential risk. They discuss public goods, moral illusions, the asymmetry between happiness and suffering, utilitarianism, “the vulnerable world hypothesis,” the history of nuclear deterrence, the possible need for “turnkey totalitarianism,” whether we’re living in a computer simulation, the Doomsday Argument, the implications of extraterrestrial life, and other topics.
Google is honouring the 334th birthday of famous German composer Johann Sebastian Bach with an AI-powered ‘doodle’ that mimics his musical style.
Users can input their own melody and the AI will create a harmony in the Baroque style of Bach.
“Bach was a humble man who attributed his success to divine inspiration and a strict work ethic,” wrote Google in a post. “He lived to see only a handful of his works published, but more than 1,000 that survived in manuscript form are now published and performed all over the world.”
Aside from being a fun way of passing time, the doodle also intends to educate users on some basic fundamentals about how machine learning works.
Google’s model for its first AI-powered doodle was trained on 330 of Bach’s compositions. It was developed by Anna Huang from Google Magenta, in partnership with the Google PAIR (People + AI Research) team which provided TensorFlow expertise to allow the experience to run in just a browser.
Huang built Coconet, the model which powers this AI doodle that can harmonise melodies or compose them from scratch.
In a technical post explaining how Coconet works, the Magenta team wrote:
“Coconet is trained to restore Bach’s music from fragments: we take a piece from Bach, randomly erase some notes, and ask the model to guess the missing notes from context.
The result is a versatile model of counterpoint that accepts arbitrarily incomplete scores as input and works out complete scores.
This setup covers a wide range of musical tasks, such as harmonizing melodies, creating smooth transitions, rewriting and elaborating existing music, and composing from scratch.”
The doodle is available on Google’s homepage between Bach’s birthday (March 21st) to the 22nd.
Creating AIs is difficult, though arguably easier than putting 334 candles on a birthday cake to honour the man himself. Well (classically-)played, Google.
Interested in hearing industry leaders discuss subjects like this and their use cases? Attend the co-located AI & Big Data Expo events with upcoming shows in Silicon Valley, London, and Amsterdam to learn more. Co-located with the IoT Tech Expo, Blockchain Expo, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.
The post Become a modern-day Bach with Google’s AI-powered doodle appeared first on AI News.
http://www.experiencecoin.org, the future of money is digital!
Guiding our fingers while typing, enabling us to nimbly strike a matchstick, and
inserting a key in a keyhole all rely on our sense of touch. It has been
shown that the sense of touch is
very important for dexterous manipulation in humans. Similarly, for many robotic
manipulation tasks, vision alone may not be
often, it may be difficult to resolve subtle details such as the exact position
of an edge, shear forces or surface textures at points of contact, and robotic
arms and fingers can block the line of sight between a camera and its quarry.
Augmenting robots with this crucial sense, however, remains a challenging task.
Our goal is to provide a framework for learning how to perform tactile servoing,
which means precisely relocating an object based on tactile information. To
provide our robot with tactile feedback, we utilize a custom-built tactile
sensor, based on similar principles as the GelSight
sensor developed at MIT. The sensor is
composed of a deformable, elastomer-based gel, backlit by three colored LEDs,
and provides high-resolution RGB images of contact at the gel surface. Compared
to other sensors, this tactile sensor sensor naturally provides geometric
information in the form of rich visual information from which attributes such as
force can be inferred. Previous work using similar sensors has leveraged the
this kind of tactile sensor on tasks such as learning how to
success rates when grasping a variety of objects.