Great Debate – Artificial Intelligence: Who is in control? (OFFICIAL) (Part 01)

Share it with your friends Like

Thanks! Share it with your friends!


Part 02 -

Will progress in Artificial Intelligence provide humanity with a boost of unprecedented strength to realize a better future, or could it present a threat to the very basis of human civilization? The future of artificial intelligence is up for debate, and the Origins Project is bringing together a distinguished panel of experts, intellectuals and public figures to discuss who’s in control. Eric Horvitz, Jaan Tallinn, Kathleen Fisher and Subbarao Kambhampati join Lawrence Krauss.

Recorded Saturday, February 25th, 2017

Eric Horvitz is managing director of Microsoft Research’s main Redmond Lab, an American computer scientist, and technical fellow at Microsoft. Horvitz received his PhD and MD degrees at Stanford University, and has continued his research and work in areas that span theoretical and practical challenges of machine learning and inference, human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence, and more. He is a fellow of numerous associations and academies, has received numerous awards, given both technical lectures and presentations for diverse audiences, and been featured in the New York Times and Technology Review.

Jaan Tallinn is co-founder of Skype, Estonian programmer, investor and physicist. He is partner and co-founder of the development company Bluemoon, Board of Sponsors member of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, and one of the founders of the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk and the Future of Life Institute. He strongly promotes the study of existential risk and artificial intelligence, and the long-term planning and mitigation of potential challenges.

Kathleen Fisher is a professor in and the chair of the Computer Science Department at Tufts University. Previously, she was a program manager at DARPA where she started and managed the HACMS and PPAML programs, a consulting faculty member in the Computer Science Department at Stanford University, and a principal member of the Technical Staff at AT&T Labs Research. Kathleen's research focuses on advancing the theory and practice of programming languages and on applying ideas from the programming language community to the problem of ad hoc data management.

Subbarao Kambhampati is a professor of Computer Science at ASU, and is the current president of the Association for the Advancement of AI (AAAI). His research focuses on automated planning and decision making, especially in the context of human-aware AI systems. He is an award-winning teacher and spends significant time pondering the public perceptions and societal impacts of AI. He was an NSF young investigator, and is a fellow of AAAI. He received his bachelor’s degree from Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, and his PhD from University of Maryland, College Park.

Lawrence Krauss is an author, professor, physicist, and public intellectual.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Video by Black Chalk Productions.


INERT says:

To bypass horribly cringey opening and orangemanbad trigger warnings, flip to 11:24

Kabelo Sebolao says:

people promoting A.I is trying end the human so fuck url

jon b says:

Lots of waffle…don’t think some of them even prepared for the talk 😔

Valeriu Ginghina says:

Just a thought that crossed my mind: wonder what the AI must have "thought" when going through the movie "2001- A Space Odyssey", because it's out there on the Internet and available for online watching or download. What if it turns to HAL ?…

sad sir says:

they really speak on russian lol

ron Chad says:

We will have real intelligence when we break out in laughter when the word 'God' or 'jesus' is sounded.

PaZuZu 666 says:

One word…


Space Cowboy says:

Check out my bot in my about section on my channel, its not to bad, will be better in time.

darrick steele says:

I just realised that I should be looking at every user's account before clicking on their comment in order to try and guess whether or not they are a threat.

JBPVFL says:

I think real AI will be when the computer would do something, realize it’s mistake and redo it differently in real time without humans “tweeking” it. Deep learning is very close, but it’s basically striving for perfection by “shedding” faulty strategies. It’s very close, but not quite there yet. Deep learning is definitely on the right track currently I think.

George Karas says:

i want to see it all but it doesnt have english subtitles who can help ? thanks

aman prasad says:

Conversation like this grows people into more diverse mindset….. Respect ❤️

Николай Александров says:

Хаха. Роботы включили отрывок из русского зомби ящика))) смешно. (Нет). Русский телевизор это грустно и страшно. Новостям верить вообще нельзя. Хочу переехать к вам в Америку, ребят. В России не скоро оттепель, свобода слова, качество и уровень жизни и хорошая зарплата. Can you help me practice English?

C J says:

Artificial Intelligence is a soft code! Protect human one code is
100 HUMAN SHOULD NOT KILL, 101 HUMAN CAN NOT KILL down the road year to come a maniac modified code deleted 'NOT' 100 HUMAN SHOULD KILL, 101 HUMAN CAN KILL what happen the Artificial Intelligence execute this code in all over the world!

Dave Mann says:

We are being replaced to the super rich elite can have total control over the entire planet.

naveed ahmed says:

intelligence replace human being….

eblgraphics says:

We are so fuck…

Nautilus1972 says:

If we create true AI it will logically develop self-preservation and see us as a threat. It is not whether we are able to produce AI that is the question, but rather should we?

Susan Woodward says:

As usual, externalizing our human power, instead of developing our potential infinitely greater internal abilities. Unfortunately, as this discussion so cogently elucidates, most humans are not ready for maximizing either. Hubris in a setting of fundamental ignorance, as is so well recognized by all wisdom traditions, is no place for extreme personal or robotic power. Computational competence without compassion is a very dangerous situation. As pointed out, we do not yet understand human intelligence; however, it is NOT likely, or even logical, to suggest that we are more likely to learn about biological intelligence by studying human-made technology. For example, none of these speakers ever mentioned RESONANCE, a key factor in development of human intelligence, especially emotional. Finally, to suggest that DARPA, et al. is likely to include public involvement in their program development is ludicrous. The concept of guaranteeing safety is absurd in a constantly changing, plastic environment that runs on feedback, not on computational programming. To suggest that any human can predictively plan for outcomes of the infinite feedback freedoms that must be included to maximize AI, is again unrealistic. And finally, but fundamentally, where is the power reliability being dealt with. As we found out during the recent hurricane in Florida, our current infrastructure is extremely vulnerable. What will the truly autonomous AI use for power. I am confident we already have the technology for this, but how will this be released equally to the AI community and the rest of us?

we are spartan's says:

34:00 chick sounds like elastic girl 🤔🤔🤔🤔

never mind says:

A machine that acts like an asshole needs an asshole to build it.

Digi tal says:

speakers suck

I AM SURE says:

This guy is always on the wrong side of the argument !!! .. It is like he is wearing his brain backward loooool Sad !

Jean Q Nguyen says:

these bots looks too cute,should have used Boston Dynamics' 4 legged pups instead

George Galamb says:

PREDICTION: Artificial Intelligence in the future are going to be so impressive that we humans will not be able to make a distinction between whether they are machines or robots, or both at the same time, or a combination of all of these three qualities. Now, that’s what I call: intelligence on a whole another level! 🤖

Michael Helton says:

knowing the solution to any problem does not allways fix that problem. How would AI handle this problem? 1st thought could be that humans are weak, useless, etc!

костя эндрю says:

where i can find the subtitles of this debats?

Write a comment